Asubsequent to it. The role of listening to the violator is to give him the opportunity to express his point of view regarding his guilt in relation to the things held in his charge by the minutes. . The provisions of art. para. the third sentence of Government Ordinance no. according to which the reasons for the appeal declared against the decision of the first instance are not mandatory since the reasons for the appeal can be argued orally before the court they cannot be applied by analogy in the case of the contravention complaint since they regulate an exception from the rule provided by Art. of the.


Civil Procedure Code according to which any request addressed to the court must be made in Country Email List writing. . If the intention of the legislator was that the contravention complaint could be argued orally before the court it would have been expressly provided for in the content of art. para. from . an extensive interpretation not being allowed as it exceeds the will of the legislator. . Regarding the sanction that intervenes in case of nonmotivation of the contravention complaint within the day period provided by art. para. from Government Ordinance no. it is considered that this is the violation of the violators right to invoke any aspects of illegality and unfoundedness of the minutes so that the.




Competent court to resolve the complaint will proceed to examine the minutes of contravention exclusively through the lens of the reasons for nullity absolute provided expressly by art. of the abovementioned normative act. The term in question is therefore without a doubt an imperative and absolute term so that noncompliance with it attracts the sanction of forfeiture under the conditions of art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code. . A contrary interpretation cannot be accepted as it would mean that a.